Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-07 allowed

Commissioner of Police and Anr vs Umesh Kumar

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

The Delhi Police conducted a 2013 recruitment drive for 523 Constable positions. After declaring initial results on 17 July 2015 (which included respondents Umesh Kumar and Satyendra Singh), the answer key was found to contain errors. An Expert Committee reviewed the examination and recommended corrections. Results were revised on 22 February 2016, and both respondents fell below the OBC category cut-off in the new evaluation. The High Court directed their appointment by mandamus. The Supreme Court held that mere inclusion in a selection list does not create a vested right to appointment. Since the recruitment process remained incomplete when results were revised to correct documented errors, the respondents' removal from the revised merit list was lawful. The Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court's mandamus order.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Recruitment Civil Service Appointments Judicial Review Mandamus Selection Process Contractual Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login