Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-02-18 allowed

D. Vishnu Murthy vs Government of A.P. & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Temporary engineering employees in Andhra Pradesh were offered in 1983 a one-time option: either accept permanent regularization under an earlier 1979 Government Order (seniority fixed from entry date) or opt for seniority based on an APPSC selection conducted in 1978. When none exercised this option within 15 days, their services became final under the 1979 Order. Years later, an Administrative Tribunal granted them a fresh option, attempting to place them in the same seniority category as candidates appointed through the APPSC selection. The Supreme Court held this was jurisdictionally ultra vires: without express Rule or Government order, the Tribunal cannot reopen settled service conditions once statutory option periods have expired. Doing so would prejudice those who lawfully abided by original Government orders. The Court set aside both the Tribunal and High Court orders.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law — Article 320 Administrative Law Service Law Seniority Determination Quasi-Judicial Tribunals Government Orders Regularization of Temporary Employees Res Judicata

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login