Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-15 dismissed

E-City Entertainment Pvt. Ltd vs State of Uttar Pradesh and another

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A municipal corporation invited sealed bids for sale of 17,000 sq. metres of public land with a reserve price of Rs. 15.47 crores. E-City Entertainment bid the highest amount of Rs. 21.51 crores and deposited earnest money. The Corporation later rejected the bid, believing it fell short of true market value, and cancelled the tender. The Supreme Court dismissed E-City's appeal, holding that public authorities have a duty to protect public interest by ensuring optimal sale price. Merely exceeding the reserve price does not compel acceptance. The Court found the Corporation's cancellation decision valid and unpersuasive the High Court's cryptic order directing compliance with an earlier directive. The earnest money was ordered refunded with 8% annual interest from 2006, payable within two months."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Contract - Sale and Auction Public Property Writ Jurisdiction Public Authority - Duty to Protect Public Interest

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login