Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-15 dismissed

E-City Entertainment Pvt. Ltd vs State of Uttar Pradesh and another

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

A municipal corporation in Kanpur invited bids for 17,000 square metres of public land with a reserve price of Rs. 15.47 crores. E-City Entertainment offered the highest bid of Rs. 21.51 crores, but the corporation rejected it, believing the price was below market value, and cancelled the auction. The bidder filed writ petitions, and conflicting High Court orders followed. The Supreme Court upheld the corporation's right to reject bids if unsatisfied with the price offered, even when above the reserve price. The Court found the High Court's orders cryptic and inadequately reasoned. However, the Supreme Court ordered refund of the deposited earnest money with 8% annual interest within two months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Property Auction Sales Constitutional Law Judicial Review Writ Petitions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login