Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-04 partly_allowed

Farida Begum vs State of Uttarakhand

Bench: 3 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

This case involved three criminal appeals by Farida Begum (a municipal chairperson), Mohd. Ashraf, and Raees Ahmed against their convictions for the murder of Mukhtar Ahmed in a municipal politics dispute. The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Farida Begum and Ashraf based on credible eyewitness testimony proving they instigated and committed the murder. However, the Court acquitted Raees Ahmed and Raees Ahmed @ Satna (Accused No. 4 and 5), applying the benefit of doubt consistently with how the High Court had treated similarly situated co-accused, and noting insufficient evidence of their specific roles in the shooting."}

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Common Intention Sentencing Benefit of Doubt

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login