Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-09-04 allowed

FULMATI DHRAMDEV YADAV & ANR vs NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

Fulmati Dhramdev Yadav, mother and wife of deceased worker Ramakant Yadav, challenged the High Court's decision that reversed the Commissioner's award of ₹3,94,120 in workmen's compensation for death during employment. The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act are limited to substantial questions of law only; the Commissioner is the final authority on facts. Where findings are reasonably possible and not perverse, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence. Collective circumstances—presence at accident site, employer's supervisor present, identification records—supported employment. The Court restored the Commissioner's award, emphasizing the Act's beneficial, welfare-oriented construction.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Workmen Compensation Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Social Welfare Legislation Appellate Jurisdiction Substantial Question of Law Factual Findings Employment Relationship

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login