Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-19 partly_allowed

HARNAM SINGH vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

On 11 March 1998, Mohan Mehtar, a member of the Scheduled Caste, was fatally shot by Harnam Singh with a country-made pistol near a railway colony in Madhya Pradesh. Three eyewitnesses—Santosh Rai, Devendra Rai, and Kamal—testified consistently to the shooting. The Supreme Court upheld Harnam Singh's conviction for murder (Section 302 IPC) and illegal firearms possession (Section 25/27, Arms Act 1959), affirming life imprisonment. However, the Court acquitted co-accused Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh of murder charges, finding insufficient evidence of common intention under Section 34 IPC. The decision emphasised that credible eyewitness testimony is paramount and minor inconsistencies do not undermine reliability.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Homicide Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Arms Act Section 34 IPC Common Intention Credibility of Witnesses Ballistic Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login