Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-03 allowed

Integral University and others vs Junaid Ahmad and others

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Integral University challenged a High Court order that set aside the appointment of Shri S.W. Akhtar as Vice Chancellor, claiming he would breach the age-65 retirement rule. The Supreme Court held the High Court erred: Akhtar's date of birth (20.1.1955) meant he would reach 65 only in 2020, well after his tenure ended in 2018. However, the Court noted the appointment may have violated the procedure requiring a panel of three candidates. The Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the case for full consideration of all issues, including procedural compliance with the University statutes."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Higher Education University Governance Statutory Interpretation Writ Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login