Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-08-08 allowed

JAGDISH PRASAD SINGH vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — Sandeep Mehta, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

A government employee promoted to Assistant District Supply Officer in 1991 with a revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 received a recovery notice eight years after retirement in 2009, demanding repayment of Rs.63,765 as allegedly paid in excess. The State claimed the promotion should have ended by 31st December 1995 under a 1999 Government Resolution. The Supreme Court held the promotion was protected under the Resolution as it preceded the cut-off date. The Court quashed the recovery order as violating natural justice (no show-cause notice), being retrospectively applied after long duration, and constituting punitive action post-retirement. The employee was entitled to restore the pension at the higher pay scale with reimbursement if reduction had occurred.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Government Employee Rights Pay Fixation Pension Natural Justice Recovery of Excess Payment Public Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login