Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-13 dismissed

Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum vs State of Kerala and Others

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum sought the right to practice traditional indigenous medicine (Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani) without formal medical qualifications or registration. The Supreme Court upheld a High Court decision denying their claim. The Court held that registration under applicable statutes is mandatory for all medical practitioners, regardless of system of medicine. Persons cannot practice merely on grounds of hereditary transmission of knowledge or long-standing custom. Only those possessing recognized qualifications and statutory registration can legally practice medicine. The protective provisions for traditional practitioners apply only in limited circumstances—primarily to those already registered before the relevant acts came into force or meeting strict statutory criteria like five years prior practice in states without registers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Practice and Regulation Indian Medicine Professional Qualification Registration Requirements Consumer Protection Constitutional Law Health Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login