In Brief
The appellant sought continuance in service up to 60 years of age. The Supreme Court, finding that substantially similar issues had been addressed in a connected batch of cases (Civil Appeal No. 10273 of 2017 and related matters), disposed of this appeal by reference to the judgment dated 9 August 2017 in those cases. No separate merits were examined; the appeal was decided on the basis that the connected matters had already dealt with the common legal questions. No costs were awarded.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.