In Brief
The appellant sought to continue working until age 60 instead of the mandated retirement age. The Supreme Court, noting that connected cases raising the same issue (Civil Appeal No. 10273 of 2017 and others) had already been decided on 9 August 2017, disposed of this appeal by following that earlier judgment. The appeal was decided without independent substantive analysis, relying instead on the principles established in the batch decision.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.