In Brief
A bank challenged a lower court order directing it to appoint the respondent as a part-time sweeper with 50% backwages. The Supreme Court held that offering full-time employment instead would better serve the respondent's interests. With the bank's counsel offering to provide full-time employment and the respondent's acceptance, the Court modified the lower court's judgment, directing the bank to appoint the respondent as a full-time sweeper within two weeks instead of part-time with reduced backwages.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.