Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-02 allowed

P. Sivanandi vs Rajeev Kumar & Ors

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

P. Sivanandi, directly recruited as Deputy Superintendent of Police in 1985, was promoted to the Indian Police Service following a Review Selection Committee meeting in 1999 that considered his previously missing ACR for 1992-93 and an ACR written after the prescribed period. The Tribunal and High Court invalidated his selection, finding the late ACR improper. The Supreme Court held that ACRs form part of service records and cannot be ignored due to delays beyond an officer's control. The Court ruled that time limits for ACR writing are directory, not mandatory, and the complete service record must be considered for promotion. The Court set aside the High Court's decision and upheld the Review Committee's promotion of Sivanandi.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Service Law Indian Police Service Promotion Annual Confidential Reports

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login