Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-24 dismissed

PEER GULAM JILANI vs PEER GULAM NASEER

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, Navin Sinha

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed three civil appeals by a Dargah (shrine) administrator challenging the appointment of his cousin as successor. The central issue was whether the Dargah's 1932 Constitution (Zabta) restricted succession to the position of Sajjadah Nashin (chief administrator) to direct male descendants of the founder. The Court held that succession is based on selection by the predecessor according to spiritual qualifications and membership in the spiritual sect (Silsila), not hereditary descent. The term 'Khandan' (family) in the Zabta refers to the spiritual community. The respondent, though descended through a daughter and a collateral line, qualified as a member of this spiritual family. The Court also clarified that 'Sagir Sinn' means 'minor age,' not 'minor son,' thus permitting nomination of persons of suitable spiritual standing regardless of gender or age.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Wakf Law Succession Religious Institutions Constitutional Interpretation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login