In Brief
An employee of a government industrial development authority sought an extension of service beyond the statutory superannuation age of 58 years, arguing that the State Government had permitted such extensions and amended regulations accordingly. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal without addressing the merits, but preserved the appellant's right to challenge the government's decision. The Court noted that different development authorities had received different treatment from the State Government on this issue.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.