Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-11-18 dismissed

Ram Sharan Maurya and others vs State of U.P. and others

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the selection process for Assistant Teachers in Uttar Pradesh following ATRE-2019. The Court held that B.Ed. candidates were rightly eligible for appointment as the NCTE Notification conferring such eligibility is binding on the State. The Court also validated the fixation of minimum qualifying marks at 65-60%, even though declared after the examination, as the Government has power to determine such marks 'from time to time' under the 1981 Rules. The Court rejected arguments that Shiksha Mitras (para-teachers) from consecutive examinations formed a homogeneous class, noting that different examination formats and difficulty levels create separate competitive pools. All appeals by Shiksha Mitras, ex-servicemen, and other candidates were dismissed, allowing the State to fill the positions according to the declared results."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Recruitment and Selection Teacher Eligibility Qualification Requirements Administrative Law Constitutional Law Educational Law Right to Education

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login