Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-02-25 dismissed

RAM VIJAY SINGH vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Bench: 3 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hemant Gupta, B.R. Gavai

In Brief

A man convicted of murder under IPC § 302 with another claimed juvenility decades after his 1982 conviction. A 2020 medical board determined his age at 40-55 years; if true in 1982, he would be under 18. However, the Court rejected this claim, finding contemporary evidence (his own Arms License application stating birth date 30.12.1961) proved he was 21 in 1982. The Court held that ossification tests, while useful, are unreliable for determining past age, especially of adults. On merits, multiple injuries from blunt and sharp weapons, plus eyewitness testimony, proved his guilt. The appeal was dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Penal Code Juvenile Justice Age Determination Medical Evidence Fingerprint Evidence Appellate Practice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login