Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-22 disposed

Sanjay K. Dixit and Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

The Supreme Court reviewed a recruitment process for Technician Grade-2 posts in Uttar Pradesh's power corporation. The original advertisement required candidates to submit a DOEACC certificate at interview. Due to certificate issuance delays, the corporation granted two extensions (to 28th March 2012 and 31st July 2012). The Court held that while the Chairman had power to relax rules, such relaxation must be explicitly mentioned in the advertisement to ensure equal opportunity under Article 14. The Court upheld relief only for candidates who submitted certificates by 28th March 2012, rejecting claims of those who used the second extension, as they lacked diligence and further relief would disrupt ongoing recruitment cycles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Public Recruitment Equality and Non-Arbitrariness Rules of Procedure Equal Opportunity Relief and Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login