Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-22 dismissed

SANJAY K.DIXIT vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld a High Court judgment in a dispute over the recruitment of Technicians by the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation. Although selection rules required DOEACC certificates at interview, the Corporation relaxed this requirement mid-process when DOEACC delayed issuing certificates. The Court held that while such relaxation cannot be granted unless explicitly advertised, it could be upheld for candidates who produced certificates by 28 March 2012 in the larger public interest. However, candidates who submitted certificates after 28 March 2012 under a second extension were not similarly situated and could not claim the same benefit, as they lacked diligence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Public Service Selection Equality and Non-Discrimination Administrative Law Appointment and Recruitment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login