Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-23 dismissed

Sheikh Juman & Anr. Etc vs State of Bihar

Bench: 2 — Pinaki Chandra Ghose

In Brief

On 19 January 1991, the deceased Askari was killed and his cousin Asad mortally wounded when appellants hurled bombs at them in retaliation for a prior Section 307 case. The trial and high courts convicted the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and related statutes. On appeal, appellants challenged the reliance on interested witnesses with prior enmity. The Supreme Court held that interested witnesses cannot be rejected merely for enmity; eyewitness testimony, when credible and corroborated, suffices. All accused were proved members of an unlawful assembly with common object to assault the deceased, making them liable even without direct participation in the fatal acts. The appeals were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Unlawful Assembly Section 149 IPC Witness Testimony Murder Explosives Appellate Practice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login