Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-23 dismissed

Sheikh Juman & Anr. Etc vs State of Bihar

Bench: 2 — Pinaki Chandra Ghose

In Brief

On 19 January 1991, appellants armed with bombs and guns attacked a grocery shop in Bihar, killing Askari (nephew of the informant) and injuring Mohd. Asad, who died in hospital. The appellants were convicted by the trial court and High Court for murder under IPC Section 302 read with Section 149 (unlawful assembly), and offences under the Explosive Substances Act and Arms Act. They challenged the conviction on grounds of witness credibility due to prior enmity, alleged material improvements in the informant's deposition, and claims of insufficient participation. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that interested witnesses are not automatically rejected if their evidence is corroborated and unshaken; members of an unlawful assembly are liable even if they did not directly inflict fatal injuries, if they actively facilitated the crime; and concurrent findings of the lower courts warranted no interference.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Appeal Murder Unlawful Assembly Explosives Act Arms Act Evidence Section 149 IPC

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login