In Brief
The State of Maharashtra challenged the High Court's acquittal of the accused under Section 302 IPC (murder). The Supreme Court examined whether the acquittal order should be disturbed. The High Court had rejected the prosecution evidence regarding recovery of the murder weapon and the accused's blood-stained clothes, and found the main prosecution witness (P.W.1) unreliable due to multiple contradictions in her testimony about injuries and the weapon description, unexplained presence at the scene, and the prosecution's failure to examine the accused's husband who was present. The Supreme Court held that the High Court's reasons were cogent and sufficient, reflecting a possible view entitled to deference on appeal. The appeal was dismissed and the acquittal was affirmed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.