Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-18 allowed

State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary & Ors vs All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Association

Bench: 3 — Indu Malhotra

In Brief

The Supreme Court directed State Governments to adopt uniform Model Rules framed by the Union Government under Section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, ensuring consistency in the exercise of rule-making powers under Sections 10(3) and 16(2). The judgment arose from concerns about inadequate infrastructure across Consumer Fora nationwide. The Court requested the Union Government to urgently address critical shortfalls at the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, including sanctioning 153 additional posts, allocating 37,249 sq. ft. of extra space, and amending Rule 11 regarding member remuneration. State Governments were given three months to implement the Final Draft Model Rules."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Rule-Making Administrative Law Institutional Infrastructure Regulatory Uniformity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login