Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-13 allowed

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Mahipal

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Two children, ages 6 and 7, disappeared on 9 January 2013. The family then received ransom calls from a mobile number, leading them to suspect the accused respondent—who had resented the children's grandmother inheriting property that he expected. Police recovered a SIM card matching the ransom calls number from the accused's house and discovered the children's bodies buried three feet underground on his property. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and imposed a death sentence. The High Court reversed this, holding he could not have inherited the property by killing only the children. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding the recovery of the SIM card from his house and the dead bodies from his compound—coupled with his failure to explain these circumstances—proved his guilt despite the technical point about inheritance. The Court restored the conviction but reduced the sentence to life imprisonment instead of death.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Appeal against Acquittal Death Penalty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login