Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-11-09 partly_allowed

Sumer Corporation vs Vijay Anant Gangan & Ors

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh

In Brief

A Bombay High Court ordered a tenant occupying prime commercial property in Mumbai's Worli area to deposit Rs. 2.5 lakh per month as compensation during pendency of an eviction appeal. The High Court calculated this as 6.5% annual return on the lessor's Rs. 5.5 crore purchase price. The Supreme Court held this method was legally flawed. Compensation must reflect the rental rate the landlord would have earned if the property had been let out—not the purchase price or investment return. The case was remitted to the High Court to determine compensation afresh on proper rental basis, while interim deposits of Rs. 2.5 lakh monthly continued pending final determination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Eviction Mesne Profits Compensation Stay Orders Interim Relief

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login