In Brief
This review petition challenged a prior Supreme Court order that had dismissed a petition concerning a recruitment process for the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners argued that 95 candidates who had not met the required minimum scores (60% for reserved category; 70% for unreserved category) were wrongly selected in violation of interim orders. The Court examined the grounds and found them insufficient to warrant interference. The application for permission to file the review petition was granted and the delay condoned, but the review petition itself was dismissed as the Court found no merit in the substantive submission."}
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.