In Brief
The petitioners challenged a selection process conducted for government positions under a 2012 notification, arguing that the earlier selection should have been completed rather than replaced with a fresh process. They also claimed 95 candidates were wrongly selected despite not meeting the prescribed minimum marks (60% for reserved, 70% for general category). The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, finding no merit in the substantive submissions and declining permission from non-parties to the original litigation. The Court noted the matter had been considered thrice already and found no justification for further interference.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.