In Brief
This review petition challenged the selection of 95 candidates who allegedly did not meet the prescribed criteria (60% for reserved category and 70% for unreserved category) in a recruitment process. The petitioners also sought refund of application fees. The Court found no merit in the substantive submissions. Having already considered the controversy on three prior occasions, the Court declined to grant permission to file the review petition and dismissed it, finding no grounds to justify interference with the earlier order dated 26.07.2021.",
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.