Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-07 allowed

Syed Zalil Akhtar vs Zila Sahkari Krishi Avam Gramin Vikas Bank, MYDT

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

An employee of a cooperative bank sought to appeal a disciplinary order imposing salary freezement within the prescribed 30-day period under the Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. His application was filed two days late (the deadline fell on a Saturday). The Tribunal rejected it solely on the ground of delay, citing lack of condonation power. The Supreme Court held that Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 automatically applies Sections 4–26 (including Section 5 on condonation) to proceedings under special laws unless expressly excluded. The two-day delay falling on weekend days constituted sufficient cause. The Court overruled an earlier precedent and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for decision on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation Act Cooperative Societies Labour Law / Disciplinary Action Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Condonation of Delay Employee Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login