Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-22 allowed

Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission vs Surendra Kumar & Ors

Bench: 2 — R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission appealed against a High Court order directing it to furnish additional candidates from a wait-list for Sub Deputy Inspector of Schools posts. After completing a selection for 178 posts, the Commission made an initial recommendation of 156 candidates in August 2010, followed by incremental recommendations through August 2012. When asked in 2013 to provide replacements for candidates who did not join, the Commission refused, citing that the one-year wait-list validity period had expired. The Supreme Court held that the one-year period should be computed from the first substantive recommendation (August 2010), not from the last incremental recommendation, and therefore the Commission was correct in refusing to furnish additional names.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Public Service Commission Civil Service Selection Wait-list Validity Administrative Law Recruitment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login