Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-05 remanded

Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this civil appeal, the Court identified a conflict of opinion between two Division Bench judgments (Prakash v. Phulavati and Danamma v. Amar) concerning the interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as amended in 2005. Rather than proceeding with adjudication, the Court invoked procedural rules requiring referral to the Chief Justice for constitution of an appropriate Bench to resolve the conflicting judicial precedents and clarify the law on this important question of succession rights.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Succession Law Constitutional Procedure Gender Justice Bench Constitution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login