Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 13 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-05-11 partly_allowed

Yatin Narendra Oza vs Suo Motu, High Court of Gujarat and Anr

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Atul S. Chandurkar

In Brief

A senior advocate and Bar president made scurrilous public remarks about the Gujarat High Court and its Registry during COVID-19, calling it a "gambling den" and alleging corruption and favoritism toward wealthy litigants. The High Court convicted him of criminal contempt and withdrew his senior designation. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but suspended both the conviction and sentence indefinitely under Article 142, citing his repeated apologies and prior punishment. It ordered periodic review of his conduct and requested the High Court to decide separately on withdrawal of his designation, emphasizing that the Bar and Bench must work together as complementary institutions bound by mutual respect and institutional grace.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Courts Criminal Procedure Professional Conduct of Advocates Judicial Discipline Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Freedom of Speech vs. Judicial Dignity Judicial Magnanimity Rule of Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login