Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-24 dismissed

POSTMAN VENGAISAMY vs THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

Postman Vengaisamy and others were convicted of murder (Sections 148, 302 read with 149 IPC) in the death of Chinnaperiaiyah during a violent assault on 26 April 2003. The appeal challenged the credibility of eyewitnesses Irulandi (son of deceased) and Ramar, arguing contradictions proved dishonesty. The Supreme Court held that the legal maxim 'falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus' has no application in Indian law. Minor contradictions arising from perception and time do not reject entire witness testimony if credibility remains intact. The Court found oral testimony corroborated by medical evidence and prior motive (attack on 8 April 2003), confirming the common object of the unlawful assembly. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Common Intention Evidence Witness Credibility Unlawful Assembly

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login