Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-16 allowed

Priti Patel vs Nalin Satyakam Kohli & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Priti Patel and her estranged husband, Nalin Satyakam Kohli, had been granted a mutual consent divorce with a settlement agreement. The husband allegedly violated the settlement terms, triggering further legal disputes and criminal proceedings. Both parties appeared before the Supreme Court expressing a desire for peace and reconciliation. The Court held that the purpose of mutual consent divorce is to enable amicable parting, not ongoing conflict. Accordingly, it quashed all related criminal cases and proceedings, restrained both parties and their families from instituting further cases against each other without the Court's permission, and disposed of the appeal in favour of the appellant.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Law Divorce Mutual Consent Divorce Settlement Criminal Procedure Contempt of Court Res Judicata

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login