Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-25 allowed

Ram Kumar Patel & Ors. etc vs State of U.P. & Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

The Supreme Court allowed these consolidated appeals challenging the Allahabad High Court's quashing of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service (16th Amendment) Rules, 2012. The High Court had struck down the amendment as conflicting with an NCTE Notification on teacher recruitment weightage. The Supreme Court held that the NCTE guideline on TET weightage was merely advisory, not mandatory. Therefore, no conflict existed between the Central notification and State rules. The State retained authority to regulate its own teacher recruitment process consistently with NCTE minimum qualification standards.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Education Law Administrative Law Teacher Recruitment Concurrent List Repugnancy

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login