Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-10-24 allowed

GOVT. OF NCT DELHI vs PRADEEP KUMAR

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

The Delhi government rejected applications from OBC candidates who qualified the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) in other states using a 5% pass mark relaxation, seeking Special Education Teacher posts in Delhi. The applicants challenged this, arguing they scored higher than some selected general category candidates. The High Court allowed their challenge, relying on Vikas Sankhala. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that candidates qualifying under OBC relaxation cannot migrate to unreserved category posts without meeting the standard 60% pass mark for the general category. The relaxation benefit has no neutralizing factor in Delhi's recruitment process, and allowing such migration would dilute merit in the unreserved category, violating constitutional reservation principles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Educational Law Teacher Recruitment Constitutional Law - Reservations OBC Candidates Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login