Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-10-18 allowed

Vikas Sankhala & Ors. Etc vs Vikas Kumar Agarwal & Ors. Etc

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld Rajasthan's policy granting 10-20% relaxation in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) pass marks to reserved category candidates (SC/ST/OBC, women, persons with disabilities). The Court held that NCTE guidelines permitted states to grant relaxations 'in accordance with extant reservation policy', and a policy formulated at the time of implementation qualifies as 'extant'. The Court distinguished relaxation in eligibility criteria (permitting participation) from concessions in the selection process itself. Since TET weightage (20% of final score) was applied uniformly to all candidates, no category-based advantage arose. Reserved candidates scoring above the last selected general candidate could migrate to general seats, as TET relaxation was merely an eligibility measure, not a recruitment concession. The Court balanced quality education with constitutional equality mandates.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights Education Law Reservation and Affirmative Action Teacher Recruitment Administrative Law Civil Service Rules Equality of Opportunity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login