Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-11 allowed

Vishal Goyal vs Vishranti City Residents Welfare Society & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Vishal Goyal sought to intervene in a High Court case (CWP No. 14927 of 2015) by filing an application for intervention in the Supreme Court, as he claimed he would be adversely affected by a July 2016 interim order. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal but held that impleadment is the proper remedy, not intervention. The Court directed Goyal to file an application for impleadment in the High Court within two weeks and also to seek modification of the impugned order. The Court requested the High Court to consider these applications and pass fresh orders expeditiously within three months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Powers of Court Intervention and Impleadment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login