Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-08 allowed

ADARSH ESTTE SAHAKARI GRIHA NIRMAN SANSTHA MASRYADIT(PROPOSED) PROMOTER MR.KRISHAN D vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bench: 3 — Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah, B.R. Gavai

In Brief

Three slum dweller societies — Adarsh, Saidham, and Maruti — sought to develop plots in Mumbai under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. After prolonged litigation spanning 14 years, all parties accepted a settlement allowing independent development of each society's plot. When Maruti attempted to withdraw consent via a letter purportedly signed by 172 members, the Supreme Court appointed a Local Commissioner, who found only 6 genuine signatures with remaining names forged from another document. The Court held the withdrawal letter fabricated, rejected the attempt to withdraw, and enforced the settlement as fair and reasonable, allowing all three societies to proceed with independent development in the interest of displaced slum dwellers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Real Estate Slum Rehabilitation Housing Administrative Law Interim Relief Settlement and Compromise Fraud and Fabrication Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login